Gender, Law, and Policy Midterm

Primary tabs

Anna Whitney's picture

No Description Set

Subjects: 

Bookmark to learn: Login to use bookmarks.

Bookmark to learn: Login to use bookmarks.

Add to collection ... add Gender, Law, and Policy Midterm to your collections:

Help using Flashcards ...just like in real life ;)

  1. Look at the card, do you know this one? Click to flip the card and check yourself.
  2. Mark card Right or Wrong, this card will be removed from the deck and your score kept.
  3. At any point you can Shuffle, Reveal cards and more via Deck controls.
  4. Continue to reveal the wrong cards until you have correctly answered the entire deck. Good job!
  5. Via the Actions button you can Shuffle, Unshuffle, Flip all Cards, Reset score, etc.
  6. Come back soon, we'll keep your score.
    “Repetition is the mother of all learning.”
  7. Signed in users can Create, Edit, Import, Export decks and more!.

Bookmark to learn: Login to use bookmarks.

Share via these services ...

Email this deck:

Right: #
Wrong: #
# Right & # Wrong of #

Intersectionality

Kimberlé Crenshaw
Identites exist at margins of oppression and privilege

Sources of law

Constitutional law, statutory law, administrative law, and common law

Constitutional law

US and state constitutions
The US constitution trumps state constitutions

Statutory law

Derived from legislative bodies: US congress, state legislatures, city councils

Administrative law

Executive order - legal orders declared by the executive officers of localities, states, or the President of the United States

Common law

Stare decisis: "let the decision stand"

Trial courts

Determine the facts of the case
Courts of original jurisdiction (first courts to hear a case)

Appellate courts

Determine whether the law was properly applied (error of law) and/or legal procedures (error in procedure) followed in the lower court
Usually not obligated to hear all cases

Civil law trials

A dispute between two private parties
Plaintiff - initiates the civil suit and can be award monetary damages if they win

Civil law process

Plaintiff files a complaint
Defendant files a response
Defendant may file a motion to dismiss

Criminal law

The state (prosecutor) brings charges against a private person (defendant)

Coverture

Marital unity doctrine

Separate Spheres Ideology

Public and private spheres

Ideology of true womanhood

Women as pious, pure, submissive, and domestic
Thought to not have any sexual desires
Upper/middle class ideal excluded those who had to work
Ideology of domesticity --> justify their participation in the public sphere

Ideology of domesticity

Clean up the world
Kinda led to the social work field

Republic motherhood

White women as "custodians of civic morality"
Expected to raise virtuous sons on whom the health of the Republic depended
Quasi-political role

Political liberalism

Individual liberty
Equality

Married Women's Property Acts

29 states passed married women's property acts between 1839-1865
These acts began to empower women to own property and to sue and be sued in their own names
Why were they passed?
In the northeast, a lot of the laws were a result of female efforts

Why were they passed?

To safeguard family property, i.e. to protect father's property from son-in-law's creditors
Mississippi passed the first property act because fathers wanted to keep control of the things that they gave their daughters (often slaves)

Woman suffrage movement (arguments for and against votes for women) for

Political liberalism: women have an inalienable right to liberty and equality
Ideology of domesticity: the vote will enable women to be better wives and mother
"Social housekeeping" arguments: the vote will enable women to "clean up politics," decrease vice (e.g. alcohol), and protect the weak (e.g. child labor laws)

Woman suffrage movement (arguments for and against votes for women) against

Women stop being in the home

Equal Rights Amendment

First draft, 1923
WWII
Push in second wave feminism
Why'd it fail?

First draft, 1923

Men and women shall have equal rights throughout the United States and in every place subject to its jurisdiction

WWII

Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on the account of sex

Push in second wave feminism

1972, the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) passed congress and went to the states for ratification
"Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex"

Why'd it fail?

Well-organized opposition movement: Phyllis Scholarly and STOP ERA
Supreme Court decisions eliminated the most compelling arguments in favor of the ERA
Proponents failed to organize adequately

Formal equality

Same treatment of people who are the same (or similarly-situated)
Different treatment of people who are different
Abstract Aristotelian approach
Paradox: equality is defined as sameness, but sex is defined as difference
Virtual equality

Substantive equality

Focuses on harm and disadvantage rather than sameness and difference
Exposes who is doing what to whom: white supremacy, male domination, etc.

Civil rights

Include civil and political rights (e.g. the right to vote, own property, speak freely, and freedom from workplace discrimination)

Human rights

Include not only civil and political rights, but also economic, social, and cultural rights

First generation/negative rights

States must refrain from interfering with certain rights

Second generation/positive rights

States have to take certain positive actions, such as provide housing, food, and medical care

Social feminists

Focused on differences between men and women
Believed that women needed special protections

Egalitarian feminists

Ignored differences between men and women
Wanted men and women to be treated identically

Protective labor legislations

Based on women's differences from men
Maximum hour laws
Laws prohibiting night work
Minimum wage laws

Based on women's differences from men

The women advocating for labor laws were laborers, usually white

HEY LOOK AT THAT ONE REALLY HELPFUL TABLE

Factors for heightened scrutiny

The group has suffered a history of invidious discrimination
The characteristics that distinguish a group's members bear no relationship to their ability to perform or contribute to society

Strict scrutiny

Applies to laws classifying citizens based on race and national origin
Test: whether the classification is necessary to achieve a compelling governmental objective

Intermediate scrutiny

In between, applied to sex
If a state is going to pass a law that specifically discriminates between men and women, need to prove direct and rational interest

Rational basis scrutiny

Applies to most laws that classify among citizens
Test: whether the classification is rationally related to a legitimate governmental objective

Facial discrimination

Explicit discrimination based on sex

Sex-plus discrimination

Mothers

Disparate treatment (shifting burden of proof)

When an employer treats some people less favorably than others because of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin
Employer does not admit discrimination (v. facial discrimination)
Proof of discriminatory motive is crucial
Over 90% of cases are disparate treatment
Burden of production
Burden of persuasion
Prima facie case: plaintiff provides evidence that she applied for an available position for which she was qualified but was rejected under circumstances which give rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination because of sex
Rebuttal: the defendant employer then articulates a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the challenged action (must be "clear and reasonably specific")
Pretext: plaintiff wins if they can show that the employer's explanation was not the real reason for the action (by direct or indirect evidence)

Burden of production

The burden of producing some evidence to support your side

Disparate impact (shifting burden of proof)

Also called "pattern and practice" cases
Practices that are facially neutral in their treatment of different groups but in fact fall more harshly on one group than another and cannot be justified by business necessity
Proven by statistical data
Less than 2% of cases are disparate impact

Bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ)

Exception for facial discrimination
"Reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise"
Cannot be based on:
Often based on

Virtual equality

Conditional equality

Burden of persuasion

The burden to prove your case
Ultimate burden of persuasion rests with the plaintiff

Pretext: plaintiff wins if they can show that the employer's explanation was not the real reason for the action (by direct or indirect evidence)

Direct proof of discrimination
Indirect proof of discrimination

Cannot be based on:

Assumptions of the employment characteristics of women or men in general
Stereotyped characterizations of the sexes; or

Often based on:

Authenticity and genuineness (actor, actress)
Privacy: businesses must be permitted to satisfy the privacy concerns of their customers if they are to prosper (restroom attendant)
Safety and security: if directly related to business necessity

Remedies for Title VII discrimination

Title VII only provided hiring or reinstatement, back pay, and attorney's fees and court costs

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

Enforces Title VII

Second generation discrimination

Many researchers believe that unconscious bias in evaluations, mentoring, and assignments, and inflexible workplace structures have largely replaced deliberate sex discrimination in employment, particularly for managerial and professional positions

Sexual orientation discrimination / Gender identity discrimination

Traditional approach
Azteca says sexual orientation may fall under but for sex
Bostock says sexual orientation and gender identity both fall under plain meaning of sex

Traditional approach

Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation

Quid pro quo sexual harassment (unwelcomeness, reasonableness standards, employer liability)

Where a supervisor makes unwelcome sexual advances toward or sexual demands of a subordinate employee
Offering tangible job benefits (promotion, job training, pay increase)
Or threatening job detriment (e.g. have sex with me or you're fired)
Liability

Liability

Employers are liable for quid pro quo sexual harassment culminating in a tangible employment action (discharge, demotion, undesirable reassignment) by supervisory employees

Hostile environment sexual harassment (unwelcomeness, reasonableness standards, employer liability)

Unwelcome sexual or sex-based conduct
Unreasonably interferes with an individual's performance at work
Creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment
Must be "severe or pervasive"
Unwelcomeness
Liability

Unwelcomeness

Correct inquiry is whether the conduct was unwelcome, not whether it was voluntary

Liability

When no tangible employment action is taken, an employer is responsible for hostile environment sexual harassment by a supervisor unless they can prove
That the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior

Reasonable woman standard

The frequency of the discriminatory conduct
Whether it is physically threatening or humiliating rather than merely offensive, and

Pregnancy discrimination

Discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, including nursing
Feminist division over
Equal treatment
Special treatment

Equal treatment

Pregnancy should be treatment as a liability under existing disability leave policies

Special treatment

Pregnancy is a unique condition that warrants special treatment in order to facilitate women's balancing family and work roles

Family responsibilities / caregiver discrimination

Includes sex-based disparate treatment of caregivers, gender-based stereotyping about future caregiving responsibilities, effects of stereotyping on subjective assessments of work performance, and hostile work environment

Motherhood penalty

Mothers less likely to be hired, likely to be paid less, "motherhood wage penalty," "maternal profiling"

Wage gap

Wage gap is greater for part-time workers than full-time workers
College educated women and older women experience a greater wage gap

Occupational segregation (vertical and horizontal)

Horizontal = across occupations, tendency for men and women to be employed in different occupations from each other across the entire spectrum of occupations
Vertically = within the hierarchy of occupations, work traditionally done by women has lower wages, lower status, and fewer opportunities of advancement than work done by men

Vertically = within the hierarchy of occupations, work traditionally done by women has lower wages, lower status, and fewer opportunities of advancement than work done by men

"Pink collar jobs"

Appearance regulation (unequal burdens test)

Court applied the "unequal burdens test":

5th Amendment Due Process Clause

The 5th Amendment applies to the federal government
"No person shall... be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law"

14th Amendment Privileges and Immunities Clause and Equal Protection Clause

All persons born or naturalized in the Untied States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside
Significant clauses

Significant Clauses

Privileges and immunities clause
Due process clause
Equal protection clause

19th Amendment

Right for women to vote
1920

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)

Adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1979 and came into force in 1981
CEDAW is an international bill of rights for women

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Has become major tool to respond to sexual harassment and retaliation
Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin
"It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to... discriminate against any individual with respect to his (or her) compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of such an individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin"
Applies to businesses employing more than 15 people
Protects men as well as women
Only have to prove discriminatory impact, not intent - unlike equal protections clause
Title VII only applies to employers with more than 15 employees
Affirmative action

Applies to businesses employing more than 15 people

Domestic workers often not covered

Affirmative action

Is the affirmative action plan consistent with the purpose of Title VII to overcome manifest statistical imbalance in traditionally segregated jobs?
Does the plan "unnecessarily trammel" interests of non-preferred group
Absolute or relative preference

Civil Rights Act of 1991

Sex need only be "a motivating factor, even though other factors also motivated the practice"

Pregnancy Discrimination Act (1978)

"The terms 'because of sex' or 'on the basis of sex' include... pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; and women affected by the for all employment-related purposes, including receipt of benefits under fringe benefit programs, as other person not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work"

Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) (1993)

Provides 12 weeks of unpaid leave for birth or adoption of a child, acquiring a foster child, caring for a child, spouse, or parent with a serious health condition, or for the worker's own serious illness preventing performance on the job
Applies to private employers employing more than 50 employees and to public agencies

Equal Pay Act (1963)

Employers are prohibited form paying employees of the opposite sexes at different rates for jobs that are equivalent in terms of skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions
The EPA generally does not apply to differentiation in the rates of pay among different job classifications or workers at different "establishments"
However, the EPA does apply to jobs in distinct classifications where the work performed by women workers is "substantially similar" to that performed by better-paid men
Different payment to employees of the opposite sexes is allowed under four circumstances
Exemptions: e.g. outside sales, representatives, farmworkers employed on small farms, elder caregivers, etc.

Different payment to employees of opposite sexes is allowed under four circumstances

A seniority system
A merit system
A system which measures earning baby quantity or quality of productions
A differential based on any other factor other than sex

Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act (2009)

Reversed the following Supreme Court decision

Reversed the following Supreme Court decision

Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire
Severely restricted the statue of limitations for Title VII cases

Bradwell v Illinois (1873)

Principle: access to professions, 14th amendment privileges and immunities
Reasoning: the right to practice law is not a privilege of national citizenship protected by the Constitution
Bradley Concurrence: separate spheres ideology

Reed v Reed (1971)

Principle: Intermediate scrutiny, 14th amendment, equal protection
Reasoning: law is arbitrary and not based on legitimate objectives

Michael M. v. Superior Ct. of Sonoma Cty. (1981)

Even if a statute explicitly uses a sex-based classification, the Court will apply the rational basis review if the statute is based on "real differences"

Texas Dept. of Comm. Affairs v. Burdine (1981)

Principle: burden of proof is with plaintiff but defendant must give non-discriminatory reason for employment action (so can challenge)
Legal issue: Whether Title VII requires the employer to prove a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for not promoting a woman?
Reasoning: The burden of proof always rests with the plaintiff but the defendant has a burden of articulating a nondiscriminatory reason for the challenged employment action

Diaz v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. (1971)

Principle: customer preference is not a BFOQ
Legal Issue: whether being female was a BFOQ for being a flight attendant
Reasoning: Discrimination based on sex is valid only when the "essence of the business operation would be undermined by not hiring members of one sex exclusively"

Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards (1991)

Display of pornography in the workplace was found to have created a sufficiently hostile working environment under Title VII

Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (2015)

Principle: pregnancy discrim and PDA

Goesaert v. Cleary (1948)

Principle: Protective labor law, moral and physical, 14th amendment, equal protection
Reasoning: law is rational because it protects women from moral and social hazards

Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp. (1971)

Principle: sex plus discrimination
Plaintiff's Argument: this policy was sex discrimination in violation of Title VII because of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Court's Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled that "sex plus" violated Title VII

Miss. Univ. for Women v. Hogan (1982)

Principle: equal protection, persuasive justification for segregated education, intermediate scrutiny
Reasoning: applying intermediate scrutiny, the court found that the state failed to show that barring men from the nursing program was substantially related to an important governmental objective
State must show an "exceedingly persuasive justification"

EEOC v. Brown and Root, Inc. (1982)

Principle: but for sex,
Legal issue: was the woman fired because of sex
Reasoning: men who froze in similar circumstances were not fire so she was fired but for her sex

Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989)

Principle: sex stereotyping in employment decisions violates VII
Reasoning: her sex played a motivating part in the employment decision
Decision reversed in part by the Civil Rights Act of 1991

Dothard v. Rawlinson (1977)

Principle: case developed a three step burden of proof for disparate impact cases
Legal issue: whether requirements violate Title VII
Reasoning: Alabama did not produce evidence correlating height and weight to the requisite amount of strength necessary to do the job
Height and weight requirements not allowed, but only male BFOQ was allowed!
Principle: safety BFOQ
Reasoning: the essence of the job is the maintain prison security; a female guard's ability to maintain prison security is "reduced by her womanhood"

Subjects: